Lugia's Song - Pokemon the Movie 2000

present
Clement
18
18/02/92
MJS 1A 2G 3G 4G 5I 6I
HCI 1B 2B 3D 4D
HCJC 09S6K

Yearns for:
Driving license
Flying license
SAT score >2100

past
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
May 2007
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
January 2010
February 2010

links
Bryan Goh
Cai Hongliang
Chan Jingzhan
Damian Goh
Daniel Tan
Darren Poh
Edwin Chaw
Elson Ee
Er Bin Hao
Ervin Seng
Ezor Pang
Feng Chongwe
Francoise Lee
Goh Yi Rui
Hansen Sun
Ho Chuan Khim
Ivan Szeto
Jeffrey Chan
Joel Tan
Johnny Yan
Jonas Goh
Jonnathan Neo
Kelvin Fan
Kevin Toh
Khaw Xuan Cheng
Khoo Hoe Kang
Koh Jun Kiat
Koh Zhe Wei
Lee Lin Ping
Lester Leong
Lester Mok
Lester Phua
Lim Jie Yan
Lum Yi
Matthew Yang
Ng Ding Quan
Ng Wen Wei
Ngiam Zi Chao
Nick Chiam
Ong Murfei
Preston Lim
Randy Chua
Sim Zhen Wei
Tai Jia Ching
Tan Peng Ning
Tan Shen Yang
Tan Sheng Jie
Tan Teck Seng
Tan Wen Shan
Tan Zhi Rong
Teh Zi Hao
Teo Tse Yean
Timothy Yong
Toh Jia Ming
Toh Kai Yang
Yeap Jun Rong
Yeo Jun Hao
Yeo Kaye Wee

Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Time: 6:41 pm
Tech cause poorer writing? I beg to differ

The onset of online social sites and instant messaging has compelled users, particularly teenagers, to write more often. On these platforms, users are required to consider their target audience when suggesting an opinion. Ergo, users tend to employ simpler sentence structures which are easily comprehensible. At the same time, in a bid to cajole others to share their opinions, users are more sensitive to their audience, and thus, make an effort to expurgate content which would be offensive to their readers.

Scholars of the previous century, on the other hand, ostentatiously write long essays in a consequential manner in order to flaunt their level of education and knowledge. The bid to appear erudite has incited grandiloquent writing, which will indubitably be repugnant to readers. Writing’s true purposes, which are to convey messages and to persuade, are inevitably lost.

The inchoate “Twitter-y” writing style of the twenty-first century, I feel, does not preclude the existence of ‘true-blue English language’, but on the contrary, is a means to restoring the intention with which the language was first created. Status messages like “John is studying for exams =(“ and “John has passed his exams with flying colours =)” can clearly convey emotions in a way that is unachievable in plain conventional writing; these emoticons can serve to accentuate and bring the reader’s attention to the writer’s feeling at that particular point in time.

Critics of the modern style of writing are, in my opinion, being dogmatic and unreasonably resistant to the changes the new generation has proposed. There are no doubts that formal writing remains important. However when writing formally, one should keep in mind the true reasons for writing in the first place. The new literacy is able to value and appreciate this purpose. Perhaps, it is time for these antiquated ‘scholars’ to emancipate themselves from their insular sanctuary, and embrace the brave new world the next generation has shaped.